Most classroom technology tools fail to meet federal evidence standards, study finds |
A new analysis by edtech company Instructure and nonprofit InnovateEDU found that most digital tools used in K–12 classrooms lack strong evidence demonstrating their impact on student learning. The study examined 150 commonly-used classroom technologies, using anonymized usage data from LearnPlatform between August and December 2025. Researchers evaluated the tools against evidence standards outlined in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which requires federally funded educational interventions to be supported by research. The study found that 60% of purpose-built education technology tools and 98% of general consumer technologies used in classrooms do not meet ESSA evidence standards. Among the tools analyzed, only 2% met the highest Tier I evidence level, which requires strong, well-designed studies showing positive results. Another 5% met Tier II, 14% met Tier III, and 19% met Tier IV, the lowest tier that only requires a research plan rather than proven outcomes. Overall, just 21% of the tools demonstrated clear positive results beyond the lowest evidence tier. The report also found differences in compliance with technology standards. About 33% of ed-tech tools met at least one data privacy certification, and 30% met interoperability standards, compared with fewer than 6% of consumer tools. Accessibility standards were more widely met, with 70% of classroom tools aligned with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, compared with 50% of consumer technologies. Researchers say the findings highlight the need for schools to more carefully evaluate digital tools as technology—including AI—becomes more integrated into classrooms. The report encourages districts to prioritize evidence of learning impact, student privacy protections, accessibility, and interoperability when selecting educational technology.