Growing debate surrounds school board compensation |
Despite some momentum around the country to increase pay for local school board members, at least 13 states explicitly ban the practice, according to an EdWeek analysis of state laws. The debate about whether school board members should receive compensation for their time and expertise has gained traction in recent years as districts contemplate how to develop more diverse slates of candidates for these influential seats. In 2023 alone, two states, Kansas and Mississippi, codified school board compensation into law, allowing members of local boards to receive pay for their work. The Denver school board earlier this month voted 6-1 to approve a salary increase for future board members, from $8,250 to $33,000 per year, the maximum allowed under Colorado law. In doing so, a board member cited a need to “remove barriers that prevent a school board that looks like and reflects” the student body. While the drive to pay school board members has happened in hopes of attracting members who are more representative of the communities they represent, no research has been conducted to test whether compensation is effective in attracting more diverse candidates or in improving board members' ability to manage districts. Still, advocates argue that the amount of time members spend working on board duties is evidence enough that they should be compensated. Many board members even say their duties are equivalent to a full-time job.