Supreme Court: Sky acted in bad faith |
The Supreme Court has ruled that Sky acted in bad faith when it applied for its trademarks. The legal battle started in 2016 when Sky sued US tech provider SkyKick, claiming that it had infringed on its EU and UK trademarks with the use of ‘Sky’ in its name, email, cloud storage products and services. The High Court ruled that Sky applied for trademarks in categories that were so broad that it could not have intended to use them across their breadth. However, the Court of Appeal reversed the ruling, saying Sky had not acted in bad faith when it had filed its trademark applications. The Supreme Court has now declared that the High Court was entitled to make its initial ruling. Geoff Steward, a partner at Addleshaw Goddard, said the decision “will mark a sea change in trade mark filing practices,” adding: “Gone are the days of overreaching to gain wider trademark monopolies.” Tristan Sherliker, of counsel at Bird & Bird, said: “A serious point for big brands is this: just because a brand is well known does not justify listing goods and services.” Charlotte Duly, a partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, noted that the decision “could open a can of worms when it comes to the trademark registers.” |
|