States challenge new restrictions on school mental health funding |
A coalition of 16 states has accused the Trump administration of attempting, for a second time, to undermine a federal court order that blocked the cancellation of roughly $1bn in school mental health grants, arguing that the Department of Education is effectively trying to terminate funding through indirect means. The grants, established by Congress to expand access to school-based mental health services, were previously halted by the administration on the grounds that they conflicted with its policy priorities. However, a federal judge ruled in December that the cancellations were unlawful and ordered the department to reassess each grant using proper procedures and objective performance data rather than political considerations. The states now argue that, instead of complying with that ruling, the department is imposing new administrative hurdles, such as additional reporting requirements, shortened funding timelines, and delays in disbursing funds, that disproportionately affect certain grantees, particularly those in states involved in the lawsuit. They claim these actions are designed to “starve” programs of funding and create justification for eventual termination, in violation of the court’s injunction. During a hearing on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Kymberly Evanson expressed skepticism about the department’s approach, questioning whether singling out certain grantees aligned with the spirit of the ruling and suggesting the actions could reflect bad faith. The Department of Education, however, denied any wrongdoing, stating that differences in treatment reflect varying circumstances among grantees and broader budgetary constraints, and that it remains compliant with the court order. A written ruling from the court is expected in the near future.