Student monitoring tools more often flag discipline issues, claims survey |
Software that tracks students’ online activity is more often flagging incidents that lead to disciplinary action and law enforcement interactions rather than resulting in efforts to make students safer, according to a survey of students, parents and teachers by the nonprofit Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT). Seventy-eight percent of teachers whose schools use monitoring software from firms such as GoGuardian, Gaggle, Securly and Bark said students have been flagged for violating disciplinary policy while 54% of teachers polled said monitoring software was used to refer students to a counselor, therapist, or social worker for behavior-related interventions. This imbalance should lead school officials to consider ways to minimize harmful risks monitoring software can cause to students’ civil rights, as well as to limit the unnecessary involvement of law enforcement, said Elizabeth Laird, director of the Equity in Civic Technology Project at CDT. Her sentiments are echoed by Joel Schwarz, a consultant and attorney specializing in privacy, cybersecurity, cyberintelligence and electronic surveillance, and Emily Cherkin, co-founder of the Student Data Privacy Project. In an opinion piece for The Hill they urge the Federal Trade Commission to enforce Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act obligations on EdTech providers, and call on Congress to update 1974's Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, which protects students' personally identifiable information in most circumstances, but which, they say, needs a revamp for the internet age.