QE Hospital claim competent despite adjudication clause |
A Court of Session action claiming £72.8m damages arising from the construction of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow has been held competent despite an adjudication provision in the main contract. Lord Tyre held while there was no general rule that some cases were too large and/or complicated to be suitable for adjudication, and the dispute fell within the relevant adjudication clause, the same principles applied as with arbitration clauses and the appropriate course was to sist the action pending the outcome of the adjudication. The claim, for breach of contractual and common law duties, was brought by Greater Glasgow Health Board, shortly before the expiry of the five year prescriptive period, following the discovery of numerous defects at the new hospital, including in the water, heating and ventilation systems, doors, glazing and the atrium roof. The defenders were (first) the main contractor, Multiplex Construction (Europe) Ltd; (second) two corporate guarantors of the first defender; (third) the lead consultant, Currie & Brown (UK) Ltd; and (fourth) the project supervisor, Capita Property & Infrastructure Ltd. |
|