You’re all signed up for Legal Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the worldwide community of thousands of subscribers who are receiving daily legal intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address [email protected], will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions

Legal Slice
Members of Congress in both parties have questioned the legality of President Trump’s military strikes on Iran. At least two GOP lawmakers joined Democrats to suggest it was unconstitutional for him to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. “While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional,” Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, who typically aligns with Trump, wrote on X. Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., wrote on social media: “This is not about the merits of Iran’s nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the U.S. without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense.” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Trump respects the Constitution. “The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and [the] necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties,” Johnson said in a statement.
Full Issue