You’re all signed up for the Education Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the community of over 35,000 subscribers who are receiving daily Education intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address [email protected], will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
Education Slice
National
Utah has enacted a law requiring students in grades 3-12 to study specific Bible passages and stories that influenced American political thought, starting in the 2028-29 school year. Governor Spencer Cox stated: “It’s about understanding history and the things that influence people,” emphasizing the educational intent behind the law. This move aligns Utah with other states that have integrated Christian teachings into K-12 education, although it is distinct in being codified into law. Critics, including the Freedom From Religion Foundation, argue that this approach risks blurring the line between education and religious endorsement. Mark Chancey, a professor at Southern Methodist University, noted that the law reflects a growing trend influenced by Christian nationalism within the Republican Party. The operationalization of this mandate remains to be seen, as state board members have yet to determine which specific Bible passages will be included in the curriculum.
Full Issue
Education Slice
California
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to reject President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship, with both conservative and liberal justices expressing skepticism about its consistency with the Constitution and longstanding legal precedent. During oral arguments on Wednesday in Trump v. Barbara, justices questioned the legal and practical basis of denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are undocumented or temporarily present, with Chief Justice John Roberts and others suggesting the administration’s arguments stretched narrow exceptions too broadly. While Justice Clarence Thomas showed some openness to Trump’s position, other conservative justices, including Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, also raised doubts, indicating the policy could be struck down either on constitutional grounds or under existing federal law. The case carries significant implications for schools and immigrant families, as limiting birthright citizenship could leave more U.S.-born children without legal status, potentially discouraging school enrollment despite legal protections guaranteeing access to public education.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Texas
A Florida-based virtual school, NFC Academy, has become the first out-of-state institution approved for Texas' private school voucher program, despite laws intended to prevent such participation. The Texas Comptroller's office approved the academy on March 13, allowing it to receive taxpayer funds from the state's $1bn program. Dee Carney, director of the Texas Center for Voucher Transparency, raised concerns, asking: “Who's benefiting: private entities or the Texas public?” The academy applied as a vendor rather than a traditional school, which may exploit a loophole in the law. While NFC Academy is registered to do business in Texas, it remains unclear if it meets all requirements, including having a physical office with Texas employees. Rick Fielding, the academy's director, said: “We have neither requested nor received special consideration.” The approval raises questions about the legislative intent behind the voucher program, which aims to keep funds within Texas.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Florida
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to reject President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship, with both conservative and liberal justices expressing skepticism about its consistency with the Constitution and longstanding legal precedent. During oral arguments on Wednesday in Trump v. Barbara, justices questioned the legal and practical basis of denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are undocumented or temporarily present, with Chief Justice John Roberts and others suggesting the administration’s arguments stretched narrow exceptions too broadly. While Justice Clarence Thomas showed some openness to Trump’s position, other conservative justices, including Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, also raised doubts, indicating the policy could be struck down either on constitutional grounds or under existing federal law. The case carries significant implications for schools and immigrant families, as limiting birthright citizenship could leave more U.S.-born children without legal status, potentially discouraging school enrollment despite legal protections guaranteeing access to public education.
Full Issue