You’re all signed up for the Education Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the community of over 35,000 subscribers who are receiving daily Education intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address [email protected], will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
Education Slice
National
A growing number of U.S. states are proposing or expanding laws to install surveillance cameras in special education classrooms, aiming to improve accountability and prevent abuse, but the measures are raising concerns over privacy, effectiveness, and unintended consequences. Supporters, including some parents, argue cameras can serve as an objective record to protect students and staff, particularly in response to incidents involving restraints, seclusion, or alleged mistreatment. Several states have already implemented such laws, while others are considering mandates that would either require cameras in all special education classrooms or allow installation upon parental request. However, critics, including disability advocates, warn that constant surveillance may infringe on student and teacher privacy, further stigmatize students with special needs, and fail to address underlying issues such as inadequate training and staffing shortages. Experts also note a lack of data proving cameras reduce incidents, with some arguing that resources would be better spent on teacher support and de-escalation training rather than monitoring technology.
Full Issue
Education Slice
California
A growing number of U.S. states are proposing or expanding laws to install surveillance cameras in special education classrooms, aiming to improve accountability and prevent abuse, but the measures are raising concerns over privacy, effectiveness, and unintended consequences. Supporters, including some parents, argue cameras can serve as an objective record to protect students and staff, particularly in response to incidents involving restraints, seclusion, or alleged mistreatment. Several states have already implemented such laws, while others are considering mandates that would either require cameras in all special education classrooms or allow installation upon parental request. However, critics, including disability advocates, warn that constant surveillance may infringe on student and teacher privacy, further stigmatize students with special needs, and fail to address underlying issues such as inadequate training and staffing shortages. Experts also note a lack of data proving cameras reduce incidents, with some arguing that resources would be better spent on teacher support and de-escalation training rather than monitoring technology.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Texas
Houston-area school districts are experiencing a significant decline in kindergarten enrollment, particularly in regions with numerous charter schools, according to a new report from Rice University. The study highlights that while the Houston population has grown by 2.3m since 2005, the number of births has stagnated, rising only from 91,000 to 96,500. "This type of data is imperative for districts but can be cost-prohibitive for districts already struggling with tight budgets," said Courtney Thrash, a researcher at Rice University's Houston Education Research Consortium. The report indicates that districts with more charter campuses are enrolling fewer students, leading to potential budget cuts and staff downsizing. Suburban districts like Lamar CISD are seeing growth, contrasting with urban districts like Houston ISD, which reported a 4.5% enrollment loss for the 2025-26 school year.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Florida
A growing number of U.S. states are proposing or expanding laws to install surveillance cameras in special education classrooms, aiming to improve accountability and prevent abuse, but the measures are raising concerns over privacy, effectiveness, and unintended consequences. Supporters, including some parents, argue cameras can serve as an objective record to protect students and staff, particularly in response to incidents involving restraints, seclusion, or alleged mistreatment. Several states have already implemented such laws, while others are considering mandates that would either require cameras in all special education classrooms or allow installation upon parental request. However, critics, including disability advocates, warn that constant surveillance may infringe on student and teacher privacy, further stigmatize students with special needs, and fail to address underlying issues such as inadequate training and staffing shortages. Experts also note a lack of data proving cameras reduce incidents, with some arguing that resources would be better spent on teacher support and de-escalation training rather than monitoring technology.
Full Issue