You’re all signed up for the Education Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the community of over 35,000 subscribers who are receiving daily Education intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address [email protected], will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
Education Slice
National
Recent mergers and partnerships between curriculum and assessment companies are reshaping the K-12 education market, with providers arguing that integrated platforms can better align instruction and student performance measurement. A survey of 220 school and district leaders found that nearly two-thirds prefer working with between two and five vendors for curriculum, assessment, and intervention resources, while about one-quarter would ideally use a single provider. Only a small minority favored working with more vendors or keeping all services in-house. Supporters of integrated offerings say they can improve efficiency, interoperability, and data-driven decision-making. However, some educators and administrators remain concerned that industry consolidation could reduce competition, limit school districts’ bargaining power, and weaken the independence of assessments. Education leaders also noted that districts often prefer specialized providers in certain subjects, particularly at the high school level, suggesting that while integrated solutions are gaining traction, most schools still value maintaining a select group of vendors rather than relying on a single company.
Full Issue
Education Slice
California
California school districts and education groups are pressing Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers to include $3.9bn in additional school and community college funding in the 2026-27 budget, arguing the money is constitutionally guaranteed under Proposition 98 and should not be withheld pending future tax collections. The disputed funding equates to roughly $684 per student and comes as districts face declining enrollment and rising operating costs. The debate centers on uncertainty surrounding California's tax revenue forecasts. Newsom has proposed delaying the funding until projected revenues materialize, citing the risk of overestimating receipts and repeating past budget shortfalls. Education advocates counter that recent forecasts have consistently underestimated revenues, particularly as tax receipts from artificial intelligence-related investments have boosted state finances. Tatia Davenport, chief executive of the California Association of School Business Officials, said: "Proposition 98 was passed in California by our voters to ensure that education funding could not be traded away during difficult budget years. Prop. 98 is unambiguous. It is a guarantee. It is the law. It is not a suggestion."
Full Issue
Education Slice
Texas
Recent mergers and partnerships between curriculum and assessment companies are reshaping the K-12 education market, with providers arguing that integrated platforms can better align instruction and student performance measurement. A survey of 220 school and district leaders found that nearly two-thirds prefer working with between two and five vendors for curriculum, assessment, and intervention resources, while about one-quarter would ideally use a single provider. Only a small minority favored working with more vendors or keeping all services in-house. Supporters of integrated offerings say they can improve efficiency, interoperability, and data-driven decision-making. However, some educators and administrators remain concerned that industry consolidation could reduce competition, limit school districts’ bargaining power, and weaken the independence of assessments. Education leaders also noted that districts often prefer specialized providers in certain subjects, particularly at the high school level, suggesting that while integrated solutions are gaining traction, most schools still value maintaining a select group of vendors rather than relying on a single company.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Florida
Recent mergers and partnerships between curriculum and assessment companies are reshaping the K-12 education market, with providers arguing that integrated platforms can better align instruction and student performance measurement. A survey of 220 school and district leaders found that nearly two-thirds prefer working with between two and five vendors for curriculum, assessment, and intervention resources, while about one-quarter would ideally use a single provider. Only a small minority favored working with more vendors or keeping all services in-house. Supporters of integrated offerings say they can improve efficiency, interoperability, and data-driven decision-making. However, some educators and administrators remain concerned that industry consolidation could reduce competition, limit school districts’ bargaining power, and weaken the independence of assessments. Education leaders also noted that districts often prefer specialized providers in certain subjects, particularly at the high school level, suggesting that while integrated solutions are gaining traction, most schools still value maintaining a select group of vendors rather than relying on a single company.
Full Issue