Risk Channel

Risk intelligence to lead, innovate & grow.

Want to get your daily slice of Risk knowledge to your inbox? Sign up now

Risk Channel helps you stay ahead of essential risk news shaping your profession. Every weekday, our unique blend of AI, risk experts and researchers monitor 100,000s of articles to share a summary of the most relevant and useful content to help you lead, innovate and grow.

From supply chain to regulatory enforcement, data privacy, GRC controls, whistleblowers, and risk management strategies. Risk Channel is the only trusted online news source dedicated to covering current headlines, articles, reports and interviews to make sure you’re at the forefront of changes in the risk industry.

HT banner
Recent Editions
rc-recent-na
Risk Channel
North America
PCAOB considers revealing names in audit deficiency reports amid investor demand

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is currently deliberating whether to publicly disclose the names of companies that have received deficient audits as part of its inspection reports, responding to longstanding requests from investors. PCAOB Chair Erica Williams confirmed the ongoing evaluation of this issue, which has been under consideration for years and reflects the complexity and longstanding nature of the debate. Historically, the PCAOB has stated, in memos from 2004 and 2012, that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which established the PCAOB, limits its authority to release certain information from its inspection processes. However, investors have continuously argued that the act provides the PCAOB with the discretion to decide what details should be included in inspection reports, advocating for greater transparency in the auditing process. The discussion around disclosing audit deficiencies is part of a broader push by investors to understand which audits specifically failed to meet standards, which they believe could significantly impact investment decisions and market trust. The PCAOB's Investor Advisory Group has even recommended reversing the board’s policy to enhance transparency about the audits that are inspected. Meanwhile, stakeholders such as the Center for Audit Quality and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have expressed concerns about the potential negative impacts on companies and the market, citing the risks of misinterpretation and unnecessary harm to the companies involved.

Full Issue
rc-recent-eu
Risk Channel
UK/Europe
PwC and EY fined over LCF audit failures

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has fined PwC and EY millions of pounds for their audits of London Capital & Finance (LCF), a minibonds firm which took money from almost 12,000 investors before collapsing in 2019. PwC agreed to a £4.9m settlement, discounted from £7m, tied to failures over its audit of LCF’s 2016 financial statements. PwC auditor Jessica Miller was also given a £105,000 sanction. PwC resigned as LCF’s auditor in October 2017. The regulator criticised the firm for an adequate understanding of LCF’s business and internal controls along with insufficient professional scepticism. EY, which audited LCF’s final 2017 accounts, agreed to a £4.4m penalty, discounted from £7m, while auditor Neil Parker was fined £47,250 – the same failures were noted by the FRC. A smaller firm, Oliver Clive & Co (OCC), which was responsible for auditing LCF’s 2015 statements, was fined £42,000 and auditor Emma Benjamin told to pay £14,000. Jamie Symington, the FRC’s deputy executive counsel, said: “These breaches are made considerably more serious by the fact that all of the auditors knew they were auditing an expanding business which was engaged in selling unregulated financial products to retail investors, and that potential investors might place reliance on the clean audit opinions.”

Full Issue
top-shadow
Read the latest Risk highlights